****I've never been a great fan of the original 1960's series.
Although always aware of its merits, the 'Next Generation' was more suitable for my...erm...generation.
I enjoyed some of the original movies when they were shown on television too, usually around Christmas time, but again it was 'Star Trek - Generations' that I remember vividly ('Generations, Generations, Generations' - Sounds like the potential title of a Channel 4 rival to 'Who Do You Think You Are?')
As a result, I hadn't been waiting expectantly for this latest re-imagining of an old staple. Generally speaking, I'm annoyed by Hollywood's lazy penchant for remakes. I have to admit though, that watching 'Star Trek' sans 'Generation' was the most I had enjoyed a genuine blockbuster for quite some time.
Unusually for a time-travel plot device, this backsliding is carried out without feeling particularly clunky. When a 'Romulan' vessel appears from the future and causes a chain reaction of events that affect both Kirk and Spock's original life stories, it cleverly creates an alternate reality in which the 'new adventures' can be taken in any path the creators desire. Very cunning (although reading that last paragraph back, I can see why people 'go off' trekkies.)
The key to the films success though, is that it manages to keep intact the mix of action, sci-fi and genuine warmth inherent in all previous Star Trek's. The actors, playing such familiar roles as they are, manage to suggest the mannerisms of Shatner, Nimoy et al without ever crossing the line into pastiche. With the possible exception of Simon Pegg, whose Scotty is quite frankly laughable (and not in a good way), you immediately establish a familiarity with this new cast, yet there's a freshness too that suggests potential for the franchise in its new guise.
The use of CGI, something that can often leave films feeling lifeless when overblown, is effective, not only in immersing you in this alternative world, but actually increasing the suspense and drama of the action. Witness the reaction of the 'red matter' in one particularly tension filled scene or the escape of the 'Enterprise' from a black hole. Crucially the CGI isn't used for its own sake but to add to the dynamism of the plot.
It's impossible to watch, discuss or review this film without comparing it to 'Star Wars' so I shall just go ahead and meet the 'elephant in the room' head on. There are in fact a number of subtle nods to Lucas' meisterwork, such as an early 'Cantina' scene, Kirk being stranded on an ice world somewhat reminiscent of 'Hoth' and in Scotty's alien companion, who can't help but call to mind an 'Ewok'.
Yet, it almost feels as though director J.J. Abrams is trying to tip a wink to Lucas, whose Star Wars prequels were so lacking in charm and warmth. It's as if to say, "This is how it's done George."
It's true, 'Star Trek' does manage to convey what is again essentially a back story with far greater success than Lucas ever managed, engaging a new audience without betraying the childhood memories of the old. Perhaps that is Abrams greatest triumph.
No comments:
Post a Comment